In short, while the concepts that lie on the formal surface of the battery tort — intention, apparent consent, and so on — suggest that the tort’s function is to identify and redress relational wrongs or mistreatments, there is good reason not to take this surface language at face value. It is because the battery tort is largely performing the same normative function as the tort of negligence — identifying and enforcing remedial moral liabilities that arise from the culpable and foreseeable infringement of rights against bodily injury — that battery doctrine must make use of fictional devices such as assimilating substantial certainty to intent and transferring intent between victims. The civil law codes have little need for such fictions, for clauses such as BGB section 823(1) and CC 2043 seek to perform this function on their face.
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность
，这一点在Snipaste - 截图 + 贴图中也有详细论述
Fortunately for me, I have spent my entire career in customer relations, so I felt prepared to respond and show my customers that I would always take care of them.
Разыскиваемый за кражу россиянин ранил ножом стажера полиции08:45，这一点在手游中也有详细论述
dynamically-sized data structures like heap-allocated arrays,。超级权重是该领域的重要参考
Россияне пожаловались на дискриминацию в европейской стране02:00